real money terms - as opposed to nominal money, which doesn't account for inflation

M/P = real money supply
- M/P = Y L(i)
- increases as interest decreases
increase income (Y) >> increase real money demand
- if supply stays constant, interest must increase to lower real money demand if income (Y) increases
slopes upward
difference curves for each M/P level
- M/P increases >> need lower interest rate to make demand match >> shifts down
- M/P decreases >> need higher interest rate >> shifts up

Current Account Balance Economics

money market curves shift w/ different output
plots the equilibria points of money market by output Y instead of real money M/P
w/ substitution, changes in M/P causes shifts in LM curve
- monetary policy >> changes money supply >> can shift LM curve

Governments in most developed countries typically finance a budget deficit (the gap between government spending and tax receipts) through borrowing from the domestic or foreign private sector. Occasionally, if they can’t raise enough revenue through selling bonds to the private sector, they can get the central bank to print money to buy the bonds. This is debt monetization. This is quite rare in developed countries but it is more likely in developing countries where there can be crises (eg wars) that lead to a collapse in the ability to collect taxes, so deficits can rise beyond the government’s ability to raise revenue through borrowing. It can also happen when lenders fear sovereign default, and begin to demand ates of interest on government borrowing that the government cannot afford.

Demand For Real Money Balances

The revenue gained by government by printing money is called seignorage. It is effectively a tax on real money balances.

The seignorage revenue received by the government is . We can multiply the expression by just to give us an alternative way of writing it.

Cheesecake Factory (CAKE) is raised to Outperform at Raymond James, with a price target of $60.
Figure 25.12 An Increase in the Money Supply. The Fed increases the money supply by buying bonds, increasing the demand for bonds in Panel (a) from D1 to D2 and the price of bonds to Pb2. This corresponds to an increase in the money supply to M ′ in Panel (b). The interest rate must fall to r2 to achieve equilibrium.

Real balance the real PURCHASING POWER of a MONEY balance. The true value of money lies not in its nominal denomination but in its ability to purchase goods to satisfy wants. If prices doubled, the REAL VALUE of money balances held would be halved. The role of money as the generally accepted medium of exchange is one of the most important properties. The other two properties that Yeager emphasized are that the demand for money is a demand to hold real money balances and that the acquisition of money has a 'routinenss' to it that distinguishes it from other goods. He actually made effective use of the cash balance approach to the demand.

, in other words it is the rate of money growth multiplied by real money balances.

Inflation approximately equals nominal money growth minus output growth , so in the short run where there is no output growth, growth .

So we can write the expression for seignorage as being , ie it is inflation multiplied by the amount of real money balances in the economy (hence it being a tax on real money balances).

This is pretty effective tax because you can’t avoid it. Anybody who holds money effectively pays the tax because their money becomes worth a little bit less but the government is getting free money to spend on its spending programmes.

There is a complicating factor here, because the demand for money declines as inflation rises. You can express money demand in the form , ie the demand for real money balances is a function of income (or output), and peoples liquidity preference schedule (how downward sloping the money demand curve is). Note that it is a function that is increasing in terms of income (the richer people are the more money they want to hold) and declining in terms of nominal interest rate (when interest rates are higher, people want to hold less money and more bonds or other forms of illiquid assets).

You can write this in terms of real interest rates as .

Over time, income, the real interest rate, and expected inflation can all change. But it is useful to think of what would happen in the ‘super short run’ (like month by month timescales) when modelling seignorage, because the big risk with seignorage (as will be explained soon) is that it triggers very high inflation, where inflation changes very quickly over a time scale where the real interest rate and income are more or less static.

So to model this we will assume that income and real interest rate stay constant and the variable factor is expected inflation: , where L (demand for money) and hence seignorage, is declining in .

This implies during times of high inflation, money demand depends mainly on expected inflation. As expected inflation rises, money demand falls. This is basically because as money is losing its value quickly, you don’t want to hold it for very long – higher expected inflation increases the opportunity cost of holding money.

However, in practice the real interest rate may become very negative because the nominal interest rate does not keep up with inflation, so you are not always better off holding bonds either! And it is hard to put your money in bonds fast enough, it may not be practical. So instead people start bartering goods, they start demanding wages more often (eg twice a week), or they start using a hard currency (eg dollarization). As inflation rises rapidly, people do whatever they can to avoid holding cash, and demand for money collapses.

Think about what is going on here. On the one hand, increasing money growth, is increasing the rate of the inflation tax (so seignorage is rising), on the other hand, increasing money growth is increasing inflation and decreasing money demand and so the amount of real money balances being held in the economy (so seignorage is falling). There are two effects working against each other here.

We have two equations: and .

We can combine them to get: , where L (demand for money) and hence seignorage, is declining in .

Now think about what would happen if we had constant money growth. Over time, inflationary expectations would adjust to the constant level of money growth, they would catch up with it, so . Here is entering the equation twice. Inflation is increasing in it directly and declining in it indirectly via inflationary expectations and falling money demand. At the start the indirect effect is small but it becomes large quite quickly, eventually outweighing the direct effect. There is therefore a hump shape like a Laffer curve, in terms of the amount of ‘tax’ (seignorage) that can be collected in this way. There will be a rate of constant money growth which optimises the amount of seignorage revenue.

Example: suppose the economy has GDP of 100. The real money stock is given by the money demand equation where and so .

To find the rate of constant nominal money growth that would maximise seignorage we start with the equation remembering that in the case of constant nominal money growth, .

So .

So to optimise this we differentiate and set equal to zero so .

This tells us that the optimising rate of nominal money growth is 48.5%. With this level of money growth we could raise seignorage revenue of ie we can raise maximum income of 23.523 through seignorage. Given that GDP is 100, this means the maximum budget deficit we could cover through seignorage would be 23.523% through seignorage.

Now what would happen if the budget deficit was actually 28%, ie we needed to raise income of 28 through seignorage. We can’t do this keeping constant money growth, the only way we could do this is to hike up nominal money growth above the level of expected inflation. We can get away with this in the short run, but inflationary expectations will catch back up with our new level of expected inflation.

Remember that in our short run with no growth, , so when we have money growth of 48.5%, we already have inflation of 48.5% (not a good situation to be in)

Real Money Balances Economics